* I’m Scamming the CBC

You Did Not Harm Us

I used to be an ardent CBC fan, for decades. But no more. Now I want to live long enough to see the death of that dank purveyor of propaganda and brainwashing. Demolished. In the dustbin of history. I know in my heart that CBC can’t be reformed; it’s propped up by the government, last year it received $1.4 billion (!). But ever hopeful, and in the off chance that maybe, just maybe, a few of their story submission readers might have what James Corbett calls “two brain cells to rub together,” I decided to submit a non-fiction article into their annual writing contest. Winning comes with CBC-styled publicity, $6K prize money and a session at Banff Center for the Arts, all of which I could care less about.

Without a doubt my article doesn’t stand a chance in hell of being picked for the shortlist. My words slam the mainstream media in general, and CBC in particular, for their disgraceful subjectivity, their vicious attacks against unvaxxed Canadians and the Truckers Freedom Convoy during the COVID scamdemic, their blithe superficiality, their compromised ethical backbone, their avoidance of all corporate corruption, their obsequious worship of the dirty Liberal party, their tedious mediocrity, their endless WOKE proselytizing. (Did I miss anything?) 

When I submitted the article, I visualized me having super strong arms and pulling back my huge, symbolic quiver and releasing a giant symbolic flaming arrow that would arc up through the air and over the CBC’s ramparts into the dark heart of the compound. Maybe my words would land where they desperately need to go and start a raging fire that would spread quickly and destroy the entire nasty mess. 

Contest entry fee: $25. In therapy terms, a real bargain. My disgust was eating me up and I had to get it off my chest. Here it is:

You Did Not Harm Us

…but don’t ever ‘not harm us’ again!

It’s a safe bet that anyone against research during COVID was gripped by terror. Most of us were in the midst of avoiding our own ignorance—some were protecting vested interests and careers—and some were corrupt and wanting to keep a nefarious agenda concealed. You don’t have to look very far to figure out why so many were averse to the knowledge that research brings; corporate-owned media was—and still is—busy trying to grind everyone into their version of correct groupthink: 

“Doing Your Own Research

is a Good Way of Being Wrong”

Washington Post

January 2024

Investigative journalist and stand-up comic, Jimmy Dore, poked fun at this in one of his performances: 

“You know, before COVID, doing your own research used to be called reading. You would never shame people for trying to get informed, no matter what other subject it was, no matter how unimportant, like if I say, Hey I’m gonna go buy a car. Don’t look into it! Well how would I know which car to get? Ask the salesman!..”

This little gem of 1984 doublespeak could make Orwell spin in his grave:

Don’t Go Down the Rabbit Hole

Critical thinking, as we’re taught to do it,

isn’t helping in the fight against misinformation.

~ New York Times, February 2021

With the perspective of hindsight, COVID showed us that doing research has become a necessity, and in some cases would even be crucial for survival. Media literacy has never been a more important skillset. Has anyone asked why the corporate-owned media—local, national and international—were all so magically in sync? Why did they all push identical “news”, why did they all hammer the phrases “all scientists agree” and “safe and effective”? Why did they squash all necessary inquiry and investigation? As one protestor accurately put it, of course all scientists agree when you censor and cancel the ones who don’t. As for “safe and effective”, pharmaceutical companies weren’t telling—because they didn’t have to. 

Blackout clauses are built into their contracts. Before American courts forced them to do so, COVID vaccine makers didn’t have to provide any clinical trial data for 75 years! They are legally protected from liability. Back in the 1980s, before then President Reagan granted pharmaceutical companies immunity from legal prosecution, people were successfully suing for damages. Vaccine makers would have to yank their faulty products off the market when more than a handful of injuries or death occurred. How is it possible that car manufacturers can be sued for manufacturing defects but vaccine manufacturers cannot? Harming or killing consumers with spoiled food, a dangerous toy or even a scalding hot cup of coffee, have all been decided by the courts to be serious crimes, but harming or killing people with a vaccine isn’t? 

Today we see the direct result of that legal immunity. During the COVID years, people began collapsing and dying on camera. Professional athletes dropping on soccer fields, tennis pros dropping on the court, TV talk show hosts toppling from their desk, lecturers dropping from their lecterns, public speakers toppling like trees, performers staggering sideways and crumpling into a heap on stage, audiences gasping and unsure if what they’re seeing is part of the performance. The young and healthy were suddenly dying, all cause mortality numbers climbed, miscarriages increased, chronic disease increased, alarming stats poured in. (1)(2)

Scientists with courage and backbone who sounded the alarm on shoddy clinical trials were rapidly silenced and de-platformed; social media platforms, including Twitter and Facebook, were actively involved in censorship. The few brave doctors who blew the whistle were ruined; nurses who declined getting the vaccine or refused to go along with COVID emergency protocols were ostracized, fired or laid off and denied Employment Insurance benefits. 

Funeral home embalmers began finding sinewy white clots in the blood of cadavers, some as thick and long as a pencil. This was completely new and shocking to the profession. And they, too, feared speaking out, though one eventually did at Canada’s National Citizens Inquiry. (3) Dissenting voices of all kinds, professional and layman, all were silenced and crushed. And you wouldn’t have known any of this unless you were researching or listening to others doing research. 

If your primary source of official “health” information during COVID was the TV news, you were thoroughly brainwashed. I know because I was one of them! Despite my instincts telling me to wait, warning me not to do it, despite not understanding RNA, despite being repelled by the words ‘new technology’ in the same sentence as ‘vaccine’, I decided to get the first dose of Moderna. I told myself, I’ll take one for the team, meaning I wanted to help protect my community.

I’ve had forty vaccines in my life: twenty during school years, nineteen for work and world travels, and then the fortieth shot was this “safe and effective” mRNA. Four months after the first shot, my heart suddenly went wonky—irregular heartbeat, dizzy spells, blood pressure so high my doctor was alarmed. By then reports were starting to come in about deaths in the UK from the AstraZeneca jab. The UK and other countries were stopping its use. With some bitterness I listened as my doctor told me she didn’t think my symptoms were related to the vaccine. I had to go on blood pressure medication normally given to the very elderly. 

It suddenly became clear to me that we’d all been profoundly conned, which was very destabilizing for someone who had always trusted science and the guys in charge. Months later, after my fear of dying prematurely subsided, I was gripped with self-loathing for being stupid and not listening to my intuition. Finally, once I had figured out what happened, who’s responsible, and why we were so harmed, I felt a diamond-hard determination to see the corporate media cartel well and truly reformed, all the health cons exposed and all the criminals brought to justice.

I began monitoring media far and wide. Any reports on sudden deaths, on the myriad of vax injuries? Nothing, complete blackout. Instead, all news outlets pummelled us with propaganda, half-lies and fear factor messaging until families fractured, friendships severed, children were sent into spirals of mental illness, and the web of Canadian society started to fall apart. Not to mention all the rest of the social and economic carnage all around the world.

Many Canadians were turned into proto-Nazis. Many called for the quarantine and shunning of the unvaxxed; suspicion, hysteria and hatred spread like black mold. Those who chose body autonomy over an untested, experimental vaccine had their lives turned into a nightmare. Canada was being marched into fascism: produce papers, scan that QR code so you can order a cheeseburger, agree to endless draconian measures and quarantines. It was hard to buy food, have a normal life, go to school, travel, access important services, and attend gatherings. So many people were happy to show their papers in order to do their part: proof of vax status wasn’t tyranny writ large, it was doing the right thing.  

Making matters worse, in 2021, then Prime Minister Trudeau dove into the hate game and used a divide-and-conquer strategy to win his re-election campaign, calling Canadians who declined an experimental vaccine “unacceptable”, asking if we “should tolerate them”. Canada’s bought-off press helped him every step of the way. 

The unvaxxed—and those like me who became anti-vaxxers—summoned our courage and hunkered down in defense mode. We worked hard to expose and debunk the absurdity, lies and corruption. Researching became the order of the day; it was the only way to light the path forward. People from across the political spectrum became a new tribe of resisters, realizing, for the first time in our lives, that our rights were under direct threat and something very dark was underway. 

If you lose the rights of the few, you end up losing the rights of the many. Voltaire’s famous quote helped give us strength: those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. Canada was deeply wounded and society was terribly divided, and we were driven to expose the truth on behalf of all of us. As Margaret Mead so famously said, Never doubt that a small group of committed citizens can change the world, indeed it’s the only thing that ever has.

Former veteran CBC reporter, Rodney Palmer, testifying before the National Citizens Inquiry: 

“They took an exceptional moment to decide they would not be journalists, that instead they would be public health messengers [which] failed to expire with the end of the emergency…and the result is that Canada’s national broadcaster has morphed into a state broadcaster. And I worked in countries where there were state broadcasters—China, Syria, Malawi, North Korea—it’s promoting government policy without question, while censoring, belittling and shaming learned Canadians who dare to object and inform us of the truth. Bad journalism is incompetence but propaganda is a betrayal. And that’s what CBC has done, it betrayed us all.”

People still ignorant of the media’s use of propaganda tactics often hurl abuse at those who research, use the internet to learn the truth, think freely and question official narratives. Derogatory insults, stereotypes and cliches are used to belittle. Ironically, they believe they’re educated and innately superior—if they didn’t hear it on the news it didn’t happen or it’s conspiracy theory. They’ve become weaponized handmaidens—useful, manipulated and strictly controlled.

Canadian society is now fractured and unwell, though nobody seems to want to talk about that. Hoping to heal by avoidance, perhaps. We don’t want to believe that science could actually harm us, but we know we don’t want that nightmare to ever repeat. Luckily for all of us, efforts to crush free speech have failed—so far. But attacks continue and we’re seeing more dirty tactics, more devious legislation to push us into compliance and obedience. The same bad actors who sold us “safe and effective” are now demonizing by levelling accusations of hatred, far right extremism, and misinformation. How ludicrous and how obvious. 

Most people aren’t “far” anything, other than right so far. Most are firmly in the majority middle which tends to be about 75% of the population; they value reasonableness and discussion, they value balanced perspectives and cool heads prevailing. The majority middle tend to dislike extremist ideas and extremist groups; they keep civil society afloat. And the accusation of misinformation is both a weapon and a disguise—a weapon because it aims to kill facts and truth; a disguise because it shields the corrupt from scrutiny.

The time to wake up was yesterday. The vaccine industrial complex is real; militarism, greed and sociopathy have corroded science thanks to lax laws and regulation, lack of transparency and far too much trust. The same people invested in pharma also own the corporate media. They don’t want us to trust the decency of our fellow Canadians; they want us obedient, divided and fearful. If they can keep us in constant opposition it’s easier to slow march us into tyranny. You would know all this if you did some research and stopped allowing yourself to be easy pickings for brainwashing. We better wise up, come together and focus on the right targets. It’s no longer Left versus Right but rather Truth versus Propaganda. 

Corporate and government-funded media are not our friends—not worthy of blanket trust; giving them our attention needs to be a cautionary tale of alert skepticism. The sooner we become media literate, the sooner we learn how to find high quality sources of independent information. It’s up to us to protect our democracy, freedom and health. 

Citations:

(1) https://dksdata.com/ExcessDeaths 

(2) allcausecanadaFebruary2024.pdf

(3) https://rumble.com/v2fuj08-licensed-funeral-director-laura-jeffery-on-post-vaccine-embalming-nci.html (Pictures of clots found in the blood at the 19:00 minute mark.) 

Excellent independent journalism builds hope and strength. Here are a few: 

~ Every minute at the Corbett Report is time well spent. https://corbettreport.com/ James is superbly educated about every dire and diabolical issue we face. And he communicates in a way that is clear-hearted, easy to understand and entertaining.

~ Whitney Webb has a brain like an encyclopedia. Her massive political knowledge means there’s nothing she doesn’t know. Author of One Nation Under Blackmail.

https://unlimitedhangout.com/author/whitney-webb

~ Andy Lee is a forensic investigator exposing fiscal corruption, especially of the Liberal government, China’s infiltration and Canada’s swamp. She’s on X (with over 220,000 followers)  @realAndyLeeShow 

https://sleepingwithgiants.substack.com

 ~ Sam Cooper, investigative journalist, former Global TV reporter, expert on money laundering, CCP operations and political corruption. 

https://www.thebureau.news

-30-

* Winnipeg Lab Breached by Chinese Scientists

This article was written by the brilliant forensic investigator, Andy Lee, who is on the X platform. This greatly complicates what we’ve been told about COVID, bringing into clear focus the complex web of deceit that surrounded the public messaging about the so-called vaccine. And it implicates Canada in a startling and disturbing way.

Chrétien Family Linked to Chinese Scientist Involved In Winnipeg Laboratory Breach

~ Michel Chrétien, the brother of former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, carried out research studies on deadly viruses with a Chinese-Canadian scientist removed by the RCMP.

By Andy Lee 

She was a brilliant scientist, credited as one of the researchers who helped cure Ebola. Then came the news of her sudden removal, followed by reports of virus shipments to China. No one knows where she is now, but we do know where she has been. One thing is for certain – the story of Dr. Xiangguo Qiu is a mysterious one.

The problems appeared to start in 2019.

It was that summer the news broke that Dr. Xiangguo Qiu, along with her husband Keding Cheng and a number of unidentified Chinese students, had been escorted out of the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg, Canada by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). The sudden removal of Qiu on July 5, a prominent virologist who was at one time the head of the Vaccine Development and Antiviral Therapies department in the Special Pathogen Program of the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), sent shockwaves through the international community. The NML, a biosafety level-4 laboratory (BSL-4), is Canada’s only laboratory equipped to contain and deal with the world’s most deadly pathogens. One of only about 50 worldwide, it is operated by the Government of Canada through PHAC. The removal of Qiu and her colleagues was described as a “policy breach,” and assurances were given to the public that there was no safety risk. Those assurances however felt meek, particularly after Covid-19 hit in December of 2019. Qiu’s work, though centred mostly around the Ebola virus, also crossed into coronavirus research. Her husband had published research on Covid-19’s predecessor which hit Canada in 2003: Severe Acute Respiratory Virus (SARS). It had further been discovered in August of 2019 that Qiu had been collaborating with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the BSL-4 lab theorized to have been the source of a lab leak resulting in the Covid-19 pandemic. Much speculation followed. Charges were never laid in the matter however, and after having her security clearance revoked and being placed on administrative leave for almost two years, she was finally officially fired in January 2021.

The reasoning behind her firing remains murky. Access to information requests obtained by CBC showed that she had been shipping live viruses, including Ebola and Henipah, to Beijing, in March of 2019, preceding her removal from NML. Any shipments would have required the approval of PHAC however, who insisted that all relevant protocols were followed. It was never confirmed if the shipment was a part of the RCMP investigation.

While we may never know the exact reason why Qiu was escorted out that day – theories ranged from espionage concerns, to intellectual property infringement, to technical policy missteps – we do know one thing now. She united with Michel Chrétien, the brother of former Prime Minister of Jean Chrétien, to expand their joint research interests. And that research was later used in work done on novel Covid-19 therapies by Michel Chrétien in further collaboration with China down the road.

Qiu’s breakthrough came in 2013. After years of experimental research with monoclonal antibodies, a combination of three which she dubbed “ZMab” showed immense promise in protecting against oft-lethal Ebola infections. Her research paper on the subject stated “We previously demonstrated that the administration of ZMAb within 24 hours after exposure [to Ebola virus] completely protected all treated NHPs (non-human primates)” – an incredible claim against a pathogen with a mortality rate approaching ninety per cent. That Chrétien would want to work with her is hardly surprising. Her study was nothing short of a miracle.

The title of the paper detailing their joint research efforts is “Dr. Chrétien’s Love Affair With China,” and it is fascinating.

Chrétien, a researcher at the Clinical Research Institute of Montreal (IRCM), made headlines in early 2020 after it was postulated whether there may be a “made-in-Canada” solution to the coronavirus outbreak. Michel’s prior work using quercetin – a popular supplement – drew broad attention, particularly from China. His former studies had involved studying quercetin’s effectiveness in treating Ebola, which were done in conjunction with NML during the 2014 Ebola outbreak. What was not known at the time is that Qiu – the virologist later removed by the RCMP – was the scientist at NML running the experiments for him. The article details how Chrétien contacted Qiu in 2014 to run tests for him using quercetin on Ebola at the NML. After finding success in those trials, they later conducted similar investigations on Zika virus, claiming that the results were “beyond their expectations.”

There were beliefs that quercetin may also work on Covid-19, and the clinical trials commenced in China before Covid-19 was even declared a pandemic. Chrétien, an accomplished scientist who has won many awards in his field, had studied at Berkeley, and trained with Dr. Choh Hao Li. He maintained high-level connections to Chinese researchers afterward, having been granted an honorary professorship at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences in the 1980s. He is also credited for bringing Chinese students to the IRCM to train at the prestigious institution. He later used those connections to contact researchers in Wuhan in February of 2020, asking if he could help by sending samples for clinical trials to test quercetin’s efficacy in treating Covid-19. A million dollars was donated by the Lazaridis Family Foundation to commence the study in February 2020. The WHO declared Covid-19 a global pandemic shortly after, on March 11, 2020.

The study was quietly scrapped and cancelled in late 2020, citing a lack of clinical subjects to test the remedy on. The claim was that the virus had been “quickly brought under control,” in China, rendering the study irrelevant as “the number of patients needed to set up clinical trials was no longer available there [in China].” Of course, today, after witnessing years of brutal-but-futile lockdowns in China put into place in a misguided government effort to mitigate the spread of the virus, we know that wasn’t true at all.

We will never know definitively what transpired at the Winnipeg NML. The Liberal government has made sure of that, taking the extraordinary step to kill any investigation by suing the House Speaker to block the release of records regarding the firing of Qiu and her husband.”It appears that what you might well call Chinese agents infiltrated one of the highest prized national security elements when it comes to biosecurity and biodefence,” said Christian Leuprecht, a security expert and professor at the Royal Military College.

We know that Qiu, originally from and trained in China, sent live viral samples to Beijing, and that she was a key asset in building relationships with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Her trips to China were well-known and documented, and hardly clandestine in nature. She took five trips to the Wuhan Institute of Virology through 2017-2018 alone, following its approval as a BSL-4 facility in 2017. PHAC and the Government of Canada were certainly aware of her activities and were encouraging not just her, but others to forge closer ties to Chinese researchers. Was she releasing information to scientists working for the Chinese government during those trips? Almost certainly. They were research partners. Was she doing it without the full knowledge and grace of PHAC, and running afoul of protocols or treading into espionage territory? Difficult to say. Only she, and maybe a handful of others, know.

One thing that we can say for certain is that her investigations in her field were invaluable, likely changing millions of lives, and that it appears that the groundwork she helped to lay not just in Ebola, but in quercetin research, conjointly with Michel Chrétien, had immeasurable potential that was unfortunately never realized. We will never get answers on why his study in China, later confirmed to show promise in treating Covid-19, was cancelled, just as we will never be told why CanSino abandoned early trials on vaccine research with Canadian scientists.

The other lesson to be learned is that we have to be more cautious with how we approach research and development projects with the Chinese government. Stricter protocols and guidelines are necessary to define intellectual property boundaries. Qiu’s name appeared on numerous research papers done in conjunction with the Academy of Military Science in China, as well as on several patents submitted to the China National Intellectual Property Administration. Is this where the trouble started? Projects and partnerships need to be carefully monitored by PHAC going forward to defend national security interests, and even while PHAC was acutely aware of Qiu’s work with with Chinese researchers, she still somehow ended up barred from one of our top laboratory facilities. Did she get caught up in an intellectual property battle by transferring research to the Chinese government? And Chrétien’s cancelled quercetin trials – which barely even made the news – should certainly serve as an advisory notice for Canadian workers who carry out research with China, only to have those projects inexplicably shelved for dubious reasons.

As for the the sad story of Qiu, an incredible Chinese-Canadian virologist who helped to cure Ebola, it appears that the answers to those questions will remain tightly locked in the vault of Covid-era secrets, along with many others. It should be the strongest precautionary tale to Canada of them all however; whatever else she may have been, she was a genius in her field, and it is hard to argue that what happened to her should be described as anything other than a tragic loss for all. 

https://sleepingwithgiants.substack.com/p/chretien-family-linked-to-chinese

* Mother’s Testimony on the Death of her Newborn

[It’s rare to see a testimonial like this. Fair warning: it can be painful to read. But it’s an important document from the early 1980s before big pharma convinced President Reagan in 1986 to give them legal immunity for their products: they were being successfully sued by heart-broken parents. We should all know, without a doubt, that having legal immunity paved the way for the vaccine industrial complex to become riddled with scientific fraud, greed and sociopathic disregard for public health and safety over the decades. When this testimonial was written, a baby’s first shot was at two months of age; those two months gave mothers the opportunity to see their baby’s neurological development, to observe their baby’s natural behaviours and body functions. Shortly after pharma was given legal immunity, they made it mandatory that a newborn was vaccinated on day one of life.]


“It was January 12, 1983, and I was getting ready to take my two-month-old son, Richie, to the pediatrician for his checkup,” Janet recalled. “My sister-in-law called and asked me if I had watched the Phil Donahue Show on the side effects of vaccines that morning. I told her I hadn’t had time to watch it, but that I’d call her later to learn more.”

In two months, Richie’s weight had climbed to eleven pounds, nine ounces from his six-pound, six-ounce birth weight. He frequently had loose stools the first eight days after he came home from the hospital. His formula was changed to plain Simulac without iron and the loose stools stopped. He was a good eater and very even-tempered, despite a nagging problem with gas that had prompted Janet’s pediatrician to put him on the antiflatulent Mylicon. An alert and active baby, he was awake more than most newborns during the day and wanted to eat several times a night. 

“Well, I can’t find anything wrong with this baby,” Janet’s pediatrician said, after checking Richie over. He proceeded to give Richie is first DPT shot and oral polio vaccine and told Janet to “give him half a baby aspirin or children’s Tylenol in four hours.”

“I knew the DPT shots produced a lot of discomfort,” Janet admitted, “because my five-year-old son, Ryan, had terrible problems with all this DPT shots. After Ryan’s first DPT shot, his leg got red and hot and swollen from the hip to the knee. It was so swollen, I was worried about the circulation in his leg. His temperature always zoomed to over 103 degrees and he screamed uncontrollably. Nothing could stop his screaming. He also had diarrhea and vomiting. All this lasted for about forty-eight hours after each shot. When I phoned my pediatrician to report on Ryan’s condition and asked what I should do, he always told me it was a normal reaction to the DPT shot and not to worry.”

A licensed practical nurse, Janet works on the orthopedic-neurology floor of a community hospital. While she has received an education in nursing and has practiced for five years, she says she was never informed about adverse reactions or contraindications to vaccines in nursing school. 

“We were never taught about reactions to vaccines, and I had asked my friends who are RN’s if they were taught about vaccine reactions or which children should not receive the vaccines, and they all said no. Some of them have advanced degrees. From what I know now about the pertussis vaccine, my pediatrician should have reviewed our family history, which includes epilepsy, deafness, and blindness caused by unexplained neurologic damage, Bell’s Palsy, rheumatic heart disease, diabetes, and allergies including milk intolerance, and migraine headaches before he gave either of my sons the pertussis vaccine. He never discussed with me.” 

Janet trusted her pediatrician when he said that Ryan’s violent reactions to his DPT shots were normal. She had no reason to suspect they were not. 

Janet remembers taking Richie home, hoping his reaction to his first DPT shot would not be as bad as his older brother’s had been. By that evening, however, Richie’s hip had started to swell just like Ryan’s had after his shots. But Richie’s hip then turned from red to dark purple, and later the purple started to spread out from the site of the injection in round patches. Richie did not have a fever and drank from his bottle, but he cried if Janet touched his leg. 

“He woke up about one-thirty in the middle of the night crying,” Janet said. “After a couple of sucks on the bottle he went back to sleep until six that morning. When he woke up, he started screaming off and on. He sounded like a cat in pain. His scream was high and forceful and then he would fall asleep. I put a soft blanket underneath him because I figured his hip was bothering him.”

By seven-thirty in the morning, he was crying again. Janet picked him up and he was limp. His cry was weak now, and he seemed unable to hold his head up. “I fed him a little cereal, and he took a whole bottle of formula and fell back to sleep. I thought it was strange because he usually was awake at this time in the morning. But I put it down to the shot and didn’t worry.”

About eight-thirty, Janet was drinking coffee, and she heard Richie give out a tremendous explosion of gas into his diapers. “I knew he was having diarrhea, but I wondered why he didn’t wake up because he hated to have anything in his diapers. I woke him up and changed him. His diapers were full of light brownish diarrhea with a lot of mucus. He fell asleep again for about two hours and woke up crying. When I picked him up, he was completely soaked through two receiving blankets. I have never seen a baby soaked like that. The odor was musty and pungent, a smell I will never forget.”

Janet gave Richie a bath to wash him off. “He was limp and he just stared at me with dark eyes as if he was mad at me. I noticed his little hands were ice-cold from the wrists down. It was winter, and I thought his hands were cold from the bath I was giving him or maybe I had the heat turned too low.”

Janet got Richie dressed and put socks on his hands to keep them warm. She gave him eight ounces of warm water, which he drank more slowly than usual. In the afternoon, Janet changed three more diapers, all of them containing yellow diarrhea. In each diaper, however, the amount of diarrhea was less. Richie’s leg still seemed to hurt him, and his fingers twitched a little while he slept. 

“I did not call the doctor,” Janet explained, “because Richie had the exact same symptoms as Ryan earlier had had with his shots—strange crying alternating with unusual amounts of sleeping, diarrhea, and a red, swollen leg. The only difference was that Richie slept more and did not have a fever, and I was thankful for that because I know a high fever can produce febrile convulsions. In fact, he was on the cool side, and I made sure I kept him dressed warmly after I noticed his hands were cold. The whole day I kept giving Richie his bottle. I just didn’t realize what was happening to him.”

At four o’clock that afternoon, Richie vomited a little. He had gagged on the nipple of the bottle, and so Janet spoon-fed him water to keep fluids in his body. “I tickled his lips with my finger, and he didn’t smile at me like he usually did. He just kept staring at me with dark eyes like he was mad at me.”

At eight o’clock that evening, Richie still did not have a fever and his hands were still cold. Janet’s husband, Anthony, changed another diaper with a small amount of diarrhea in it while Janet was at the drugstore buying Pedialyte for Richie. At ten forty-five, she woke her baby up and started to give him a bottle. 

“He took two sucks. His eyes were open. All of a sudden he stopped sucking. I shook his shoulder, and called his name. He didn’t respond to me. I put my lips to his forehead, and he was ice cold and clammy. Then he started sighing. With each breath, he made a sighing sound.”

With Richie in her arms, Janet ran and told her husband there was something wrong with their baby. Anthony held Richie while Janet called her doctor’s answering service and explained to the pediatrician on call that Richie had had his first DPT shot the day before. She told him all the symptoms Richie had shown since then. 

“I told him everything that had happened to Richie since he got his shot the day before,” Janet said. “He didn’t sound worried and agreed that it was probably a DPT reaction. While I was talking to him, Anthony came into the room and held Richie under the kitchen light, and I noticed Richie’s pupils were not responding to the light. I told the doctor that, too. He told me that if I wanted to, I could take him to the hospital and have him checked over. I said yes, I would, and asked him if he was going to meet us there. He said, no, it wasn’t necessary, that someone else would check Richie and call him back with the results. 

“He didn’t tell me to call an ambulance and rush him to the nearest hospital. He just wasn’t that concerned about the symptoms I described,” Janet recalled. She hung up with a feeling of foreboding that she could not shake. 

Anthony and Janet decided they had better get Richie to the hospital immediately. Anthony hurriedly dressed and left to warm up the car while Janet rushed into Ryan’s bedroom and woke him up. Then she ran into her bedroom and laid Richie on the bed so she could get dressed to go to the hospital. Five-year-old Ryan came into Janet’s bedroom and watched his baby brother, who was lying on the bed staring at the ceiling and sighing. 

“I picked Richie up, and he stopped breathing. I screamed for Anthony and breathed into Richie’s mouth but there was no response. I ran down to the dining room and started to perform CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) on him while Anthony called the ambulance. I kept doing CPR, and all of a sudden vomit started to fly out of his mouth. I turned him over and clapped him on the back to clear his breathing passages. Then I continued with the CPR. The ambulance came and the paramedics continued the CPR. I knew my baby was gone. I kept screaming he was dead. When he had stopped breathing in my arms, all of a sudden, the whole day came together like one big nightmare. He had been dying all day, and I didn’t even know it.”

Richie had died thirty-three hours after he received his first DPT shot. When the emergency-room doctor pronounced Richie dead, Janet told the nurses to call her pediatrician. 

[Dear Reader, unfortunately one page is missing from this document. I downloaded it and must have made an error and when I tried to find it again on the Wayback Machine, I couldn’t, it wasn’t there. Was the document disappeared? In this current atmosphere of dire corruption and evil, perhaps so. In any case, here’s the rest of the testimony.]

…lungs and brain. Janet and Anthony then set up a meeting with the coroner to discuss the autopsy report. 

When they entered the coroner’s office, a nurse handed Janet an article entitled “The Pathologist and the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)” and told her to read it. Janet refused. Then the coroner started reading out loud to her from the article. She interrupted him. “My son did not die a SIDS death,” she said. “Now let me tell you what happened in the thirty-three hours following Richie’s first DPT shot.” She told him, and he listened. He then wrote down on the death certificate, “death due to irreversible shock”. When Janet asked him what caused the shock, he said the best he could do was to write down that the shock was due to a “possible DPT reaction”. 

Janet asked the coroner why he could not state point-blank that Richie’s death was due to a DPT shot reaction, when it was obvious that was the case. She produced the Physician’s Desk Reference (PDR) and read him the portion pertaining to pertussis vaccine reactions. The PDR was one of the many medical references and scientific articles Janet had read since Richie’s death. 

“He said he couldn’t write down on the death certificate that Richie had died from a DPT reaction because ‘the state’s standing on immunizations would be in an uproar’. Besides, he said, it would be unscientific because the autopsy report was not specific enough about the cause of death. At that point, we discussed the specific, scientific definition of SIDS. Finally, he admitted that my son had died from ‘irreversible shock’ due to ‘probable reaction to DPT’”. 

The coroner gave Janet and Anthony a note exempting any future children they might have from receiving the pertussis vaccine. Three weeks later he gave them a signed “query of death” stating the official cause of death, which was that Richie died from “irreversible shock” due to a “probable reaction to DPT”. About two and a half months later, they discovered that Richie’s official death certificate had not yet been filed by the coroner at the town clerk’s office. 

“We kept waiting for the state to send us an official death certificate and when we didn’t get one, we called the town clerk’s office and discovered that the official cause of death had never been filed by the coroner with the registrar. After we gave the registrar the signed ‘query of death’ given to us by the coroner more than two months before, listing the cause of Richie’s death, we received an official death certificate the next day.”

Janet recently spoke with her county health commissioner and asked if the county was aware of the coroner’s report and the official cause of Richie’s death. “The commissioner told that she was not aware of the official cause of death, although she had heard that my son died soon after a DPT shot. She admitted that there is no follow-up on reports of adverse reactions or deaths immediately following immunization by state or county health officials.”

“You see, at the time of Richie’s death, my husband and I were very concerned that Richie might have reacted to a bad lot of DPT vaccine. We wanted the vaccine preserved for analysis to find out if there was something wrong with it, but to our knowledge nothing was done. We were concerned that other children might receive the same vaccine, and we felt it should be investigated.”

The commissioner also told Janet that it costs the state and private pediatricians a great deal of money to spend office time to educate parents about adverse reactions to vaccines. “She told me that it costs the state health clinics fifty-five dollars [early 1980s] per child to explain to the mothers about reactions and have them sign the consent forms that are required by law in public health clinics. But it costs a private pediatrician only twenty-five dollars to give the same vaccine to a child, because private doctors are not federally required to inform parents about reactions and have them sign a consent form. She said, ‘Doctors are not paid to educate parents. They are paid to give vaccinations. Besides, most parents do not want to know about adverse reactions because it puts the responsibility in their laps and they don’t want to have to deal with it.’” 

Janet was in a state of shock for weeks after Richie’s death. She could not drive a car or make the simplest decision without help. Anxiety attacks made it difficult for her to leave the house. A person who had always prided itself [sic] on her strength and steadfastness, she was completely lost for the first time in her life.

Five-year-old Ryan was also in a state of shock. He had seen this baby brother die in his mother’s arms and had experienced the anguish and terror which that night had brought to his family. In the days following Richie’s death, Ryan started exploding with hysterical fits; he refused to eat unless Janet first tested his food for “poison”.

“Ryan did not understand why the baby died. Everything I had taught him over the years—like not putting anything in your mouth except food—became blown out of proportion. If he touched a plant leaf, he would scream that he was going to die. He thought everything was going to kill him, and he would make me eat each bit of his food first—even ice cream—before he would eat it.”

In the middle of making funeral arrangements for Richie, Janet stopped and took Ryan aside. She held him close and talked softly to him.

“’Ryan,’ I said, ‘we are a special family now. We have a baby angel to watch over us. Richie is a baby angel now and he has magic. His magic will make us love each other more.’ Ryan became calmer, but he still wanted to know why Richie died. So it told him, ‘When babies are born, they get shots to make them strong. The shots didn’t work for Richie. They didn’t make him strong.’ And he seemed to understand.”

One morning later that winter, Ryan and Janet were looking out the window at the falling snow. Janet remembers it was a bright day and sunlight was hitting the snow just right. “It looked as if the sky was raining little diamonds that were fluttering down all around, covering the trees and grass with sparkles. Ryan said, ‘Mommy, what is it?’ We used to call that angel dust when I was a child, so I said, ‘That is angel dust.’ He looked at me with big eyes and said, ‘Mommy, is Richie doing that?’ I thought, well, what’s the harm and said, ‘Yes, Richie is doing that for you.’ Well, he ran around the house so excited for about two hours. When it stopped, he said, ‘Mommy, I think Richie got tired of throwing it down.’”

They laughed together. It was then that Janet knew Ryan had finally accepted Richie’s death. “Ryan knows the shot didn’t work for Richie, but he doesn’t know the DPT shot killed him. Someday he will know. I am keeping all the records for him so he will know why his brother died.” 


Here’s a clip from 1985 and the Phil Donohue show about vaccine injuries. Again, this was just prior to then President Reagan giving legal immunity to pharmaceutical companies.


Some memes to illustrate the precarious and degraded nature of ‘public health’ today.













* Dr. Hoffe Received the Second Worst Vaccine Batch

  • Health officials knew
  • Dr. Bonnie Henry ordered Dr. Hoffe reported to the College of Physicians and Surgeons
  • Did BC receive defective product from the U.S.?
  • Look up your batch number

Freedom of Information (FOI) requests placed by indie reporter Lex Acker reveals that BC health officials, including Dr. Bonnie Henry, knew the vaccine was causing injuries but they explained them away and ignored the evidence coming in.

The email dated April 8, 2021, with the subject heading of “Devastating Vaccine Injuries Among the residents of Lytton”, reveals Henry’s response: “I believe we should also report this person [Dr. Hoffe] to the College.”

This email among medical professionals discusses the fact that BC was experiencing higher injury rates than anywhere else in Canada.

The story is told here in video by excellent BC indie reporter Odessa Orlewicz at Liberty Talk Canada.

This question has to be asked. Was BC the unknowing recipient of defective product? Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reported in his exhaustively researched book The Real Anthony Fauci (a must read): “After an inspection of its vaccine manufacturing facility, HHS ordered Emergent [the American company making Covid vaccines ] to discard millions of contaminated doses. Instead, in March 2021, the company shipped millions of doses of its defective vaccines to Canada, Mexico, Europe and South Africa.” (page 402)

Do you know your batch/Lot number? If you know your Lot # you can look up the list of reported injuries at this website. Scroll down to the red buttons. No doubt total injury numbers are higher than reported.

Look up your batch to see how bad it is. My batch is Lot #3001657. That information was on the Immunization Record Card given to me by the nurse when I took the first, and only, modeRNA jab. Four months after, I experienced a sudden, extreme onset of high blood pressure. 220/180! That’s stroke territory. My heart function was a mess, I was pretty sure I was going to die and quickly made end-of-life plans. I had to go on blood pressure medication to bring my blood pressure down. Despite having no serious health concerns prior to receiving the “vaccine”, the doctor didn’t think it was the cause.

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that if a doctor reported injuries, as Dr. Hoffe did, they came to the attention of medical authorities for all the wrong reasons.

I’m in my 60s now. I’ve had 40 jabs—20 during school years, 19 for world travels, and never had a reaction other than a few days of soreness around the injection site. Then, the 40th, this so-called “safe and effective” mRNA technology, slammed me. And so many other people.

What a tragic, corrupt, evil sham it all is.  

* DR. HOFFE IS FREED OF SHAM CHARGES!

“This is the time to celebrate one victory in a long war against medical tyranny.”

~ Dr. Charles Hoffe

   Dr. Charles Hoffe, Lytton doctor and former emergency room physician being honoured at a potluck lunch on October 19th, 2024 (thanks to Leesa for the video). On behalf of the community, Fred Raphael presented him with a carving of a warrior’s face for his courage, integrity and commitment to public health.

Perhaps, given that the tide is finally turning, the BC College of Physicians and Surgeons preferred to slink back into the shadows? They didn’t want Hoffe’s lawyer exposing their malfeasance for the whole world to see? Their most ludicrous claim was that Dr. Hoffe had used social media to promote “vaccine hesitancy”—he doesn’t use social media—and he has no social media accounts.

Over dinner at the Reynold’s, Dr. Hoffe shared the exciting news that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently called him. Kennedy, now America’s Secretary of Health and Human Services, told Dr. Hoffe that he had heard about him and what has been done to him. RFK asked Hoffe for the details because he’s doing research for a documentary he’s making. We very much look forward to seeing that.

American wrecking balls are taking down rotten institutions and exposing corrupted, so-called “science”. The same will soon be happening here, if justice still prevails in Canada. Will the College be held to account for causing so much harm and participating in big pharma’s crimes against humanity? We shall see. Judges have been awarding big payouts and retroactive wages for those who were fired for declining the experimental, untested product. Class action lawsuits are piling up. Surely Dr. Hoffe is owed significant monetary reparations for the harms done to him.

For speaking out about his patients who were getting injured by the modeRNA “vaccine”, Dr. Hoffe was silenced and cancelled. “I’ve lost my wife, I’ve lost my children, I’ve lost my medical practice. But I didn’t lose my dog, I didn’t lose my house, and I didn’t lose my health. And I have not lost my faith in God. So I am here, I’m a man on a mission to stand up for what is right. To stand up for you, your children, and your children’s children so they will have a future of hope in Canada. But we need to hold these people who have been so dishonest and so cruel to the people of this land, we need to hold them to account.”

No excuse for the tyrannical lawfare against a beloved country doctor who’s responsible for the communities dotted around remote canyons in mountains as massive as the Swiss Alps. Case in point: when his cell phone rang during our congratulatory dinner—it was a call from a patient in Fountain—Dr. Hoffe quickly finished his salad, said his goodbyes and drove off into the night, down Seton Lake road, over Twenty-Three Camels bridge, and onto highway 99 North, just two little headlights in a sea of pitch black on his way to attend to the needs of the people he’s been serving for 30 years.