* Reading Notes ~ Imperial Twilight – the Opium War and the End of China’s Last Golden Age

by Stephen R. Platt

I keep hearing Sino pundits say that China is motivated to conquer the West with fentanyl and other devious methods of warfare in retaliation for the ‘humiliation’ they suffered due to opium and the Opium Wars. And I don’t buy that explanation one bit. They have always been into devious warfare and the humiliation story is simply propaganda of convenience and deception.

In many ways, the so-called ‘loss of face’ that is supposed to be part of Chinese culture is simply male ego not wanting to admit culpability and disastrous short-comings. Endemic, chronic corruption and abuse by a vast network of bullying bureaucrats had impoverished the people for centuries. When modernity came to China’s shores, China was in the grip a 1000-year tradition of China’s ruling caste of “emperors” living in absolute splendour. Modernity revealed a long chain of cause and effect and perilous weakness.

As for the Opium Wars, within China opium had been used since the 1200s by the royal courts and their massive retinues—each royal had hundred/thousands of slaves and eunichs and everyone used opium. Opium use and production continued right into the 20th century. In the 1930s, 40s, 50s, opium funded endless warring as Stalinist Communism gradually, over those decades, overcame the nation. Chairman Mao was the ultimate winner because (1) in the 40s he got into the opium production game which stuffed his coffers full of much-needed money and (2) he was the most devious and brutal of them all. Read Mao: the Unknown Story by Jung Chang, it’s >600 pages and a real eye-opener.

But back to reading notes from Platt’s Imperial Twilight and me looking for details that would contradict/complicate/disassemble that opium humiliation narrative.

Opium use in China was primarily a luxury of the wealthy and their huge retinue of eunuchs who served them.

Same old same old playbook we see everywhere else. The ruling class, contrary to their incessant claims, did not look after the people properly. The poverty class could not buy land, many were driven off the land and lived on river boats and eventually organized into a pirate class.

The White Lotus rebels on land were poor and desperate to overturn Peking rule. The war against them bankrupted the emperor whose “taxes” came from wealthy traders in the south, whose wealth came from trading tea primarily to the British, but other nations also. The Canton tea trade and the British East India Company were dominant in trade exports. Then came opium.

Steady but small market for opium within China which was not profitable, compared to the Canton tea trade. Though opium was illegal, a rogue commerce was well established.

“Opium by the early 19th century had been long established as a high-end luxury good and despite various edicts condemning it, there seemed from the outside to be no social stigma to its purchase or use.” (p.195)

Competition within India to grow poppies resulted in a glut of opium, which eventually drove prices down, making it less expensive to buy in China so people who weren’t wealthy began indulging in it. When East India Company lost its opium monopoly to independent poppy growers in India, the rate of opium use in China exploded.

Jardine, Matheson and Company (2 Scotsmen) endures to this day as a major multi-national conglomerate headquartered in HK with more than 44K employees.

Matheson imported a printing press to Canton in order to publish the Canton Register. Its purpose was to share shipping news and advocate for the doctrine of free trade.

Super interesting but hardly known Indian character in the opium trade: Jamsetjee Jeejeebuoy—rags to riches story, Bombay philanthropist.

Opium was forbidden but traders also knew it was welcome and trading in it carried almost no risk of punishment. Chinese government efforts to suppress the relatively open traffic were infrequent and half-hearted (205) because many officials were themselves opium users or otherwise involved. Nothing Peking did to rein in corruption worked, decade after decade, emperor after emperor. Chinese enforcement was not just ineffective but almost non-existent.

Dynasties, imperial families, all rotten. All hedonists. Poppies cultivated in the Tang dynasty in the 8thcentury. Chinese medical texts described opium as a medicinal. From 1730s to 1810 not a single case of clear-cut prosecution for opium offences in the Qing empire. Eunuch servants in emperor courts outnumbered the royal family 40 to 1 and they all smoked opium. Opium smoking in the general population spread easily enough.

When opium use went from ingesting to smoking it, that’s when opium became huge. “Imperial guards and government officials were using it. It was becoming socially respectable (225). Even Chinese scholars were opium addicted.

In 1820, a few 100s of one percent of the population were using. 5000 chests of opium brought in per year would supply 40K habitual users nation-wide.

“Against latter day nationalist claims that the British came and forced opium down the throats of helpless Chinese consumers, there was in fact a domestic opium production in China already in place to compete with the import market in Canton (especially in the empire’s western and south western provinces)”. (227)

Traders couldn’t even get into the country, all they could do was to carry their opium to China’s southern coast and sell it to the Chinese agents. Everything from there on into the Qing empire was entirely in Chinese hands.” (228)

One scholar, Bao Shichen, in early 1800s said, “By the time I was a young student, everything was falling apart. Bribery was pervasive and open, the administration was contaminated and vile, and people’s energy was taut like a spring, as if there might be rebellion.” (233)

Over several centuries, “conditions in China were getting worse. Successive dynasties rarely left China in a more solid position than they found it. Patronage, bribery, and embezzlement were the accepted norm among civil officials, especially in the lower orders.” (302)

Taiwan belonged to the Dutch who conquered the aborigines who were not Chinese. A massive influx of Chinese to Taiwan occurred when no good land was available in China.

Matheson pushed hard for war with China. Typical capitalist playbook: once big profits are being made, giving it up will not happen without a fight.

Two decades of dithering, China seemed paralyzed by its internal inertia, the severity of corruption, the size of the nation, but gradually found its footing and got tough. In 1839 the sh*t hit the fan.

The political machinations ground on, power plays, warring, the usual male pattern sociopathy. After a brief “war,” in which the Brits lived up to their moniker of “barbarians,” the Brits got a payment for their opium product that was destroyed and the right to set up residence on a then-empty island called Hong Kong.

Matheson funneled “the vast fortune from his China trade (opium included) back into real estate in Scotland; Matheson would die the 2nd-largest landowner in the entire UK.” (452)

“[Little is said] of the fact that so much of that ‘substantial good’ [Jeejeebuoy’s philanthropy] dispensed to such a ‘large portion of the human race’, was made possible by Jeejeebuoy’s sale, through Jardine and Matheson, of Indian opium to Chinese smugglers.” (433)

Some British Lords and other privileged politicos condemned slavery while fighting a war in support of opium traffickers. The toxic male brotherhood a.k.a. ‘capitalism’ always exists.

After the war, opium imports INCREASED. 1850s. Then, with legalization, the domestic production produced 10X more than imported quantities. “China wallowed in a quagmire of official corruption it could not escape.” (446)

**Opium money—through the fortunes of the Forbes brothers [ancestors of today’s Forbes magazine] financed the building of US railroads in the American mid-west.

-30-

* Are We Critical Thinkers?

This AGE OF INFORMATION is harming our ability to be critical thinkers. In Finland and Denmark they start teaching media literacy to grade schoolers. Why aren’t we doing that here? If we all become MEDIA LITERATE—able to recognize media tactics and methods—we safeguard our brainpower, as well as our rights and freedoms. 

News departments don’t have time for context or complexity. Corporate-owned media expects their audience to believe what’s being broadcast is the truth—but it can only be a sliver of reality. 

That sliver of reality is easily massaged into one frame or another.

And information is missing so people who get their news from corporate-owned media are turning into a sub-class whose emotions are regularly manipulated. Here’s one potent example. For many years, big pharma has hired “influencers” to be in all social media spaces where children gather in order to normalize gender confusion—to  make it rad, cool and edgy. Gender confusion did not arise naturally. (See Jennifer Bilek for the facts and history) Big Pharma’s psychopathic marketing causes tragic harms but nets billions in drug sales and profits. The vultures are circling.

Causing gender confusion in children is Age of Information warfare and a crime against humanity. And the news never reports any of it—because those who are heavily invested in big pharma also own the dinosaur media. We all need to understand this. Learn everything you can about Blackrock and Larry Fink.

To become a critical thinker, try this. Observe how TV is made for one minute. Notice all the moving parts: edit cuts, camera changes, close-ups, wide shots, rapid pacing, zooms, voiceover narration, aerial drone footage, etc. The screen jumps every few seconds—that’s by design. It’s been proven that the illusion of action overwhelms our rational faculties and puts our minds into a state of hypnosis, making us receptive to advertisers and propaganda.

Fear baiting. Many news stories contain the words “could”, “studies suggest” and “experts are concerned”. Since anything could happen but is not happening now, why foment fear? Because anxious, worried people are easier to direct.

Corporate-owned media hammers their “official” narratives day in and day out—climate crisis, immigration, Trump, far right extremist bogeymen—and drops them into the airwaves with dizzying frequency—which is by design. Their misinformation treadmill produces rage, confusion, exhaustion. Best if we are worn down by Trump news than informed about devious legislation like Bill C-8 removing our rights and free speech and advancing the globalist agenda of digital IDs, one world banking, and the bio-tech surveillance state. Power is shifting to the dark side so fast it will make Trump look like a silly buffoon. The 1% care about grabbing more for themselves, not the farce of Left/Right politics which keep us plebs preoccupied. 

Want to know more about the hot mess of this Age of Information, keep reading.

Sam Cooper from TheBureau news : “Influence from various sources is making its way into your TV news.” In this informative interview with Jason James of Brave New Normal about propaganda, “This is how the sausage is made. And the sausage is rotten.”

GASLIGHTING is another well-worn tactic used by unscrupulous media.

The movie Gaslighting is a classic; it illustrates how devious persuasion is used to undermine a person’s critical faculties. The goal is to make someone unsure of what they believe and implant false beliefs for the benefit of someone with bad intent.

Another facet of this hot mess is the PSYOP, which is short for psychological operation.

THE OVERTON WINDOW. You may see this phrase but not understand what it means in terms of the way media manipulates what we know and believe. Here’s a primer.

Wikipedia page: In the early 1990s, Overton described a spectrum from “more free” to “less free” with regard to governmental intervention, which he presented graphically on a vertical axis to avoid comparison with the left-right political spectrum.[6] As the spectrum moves or expands, an idea at a given location on the scale may become more or less politically acceptable. Overton claimed that politicians typically act freely only within the “window” of those seen as acceptable.

* WHAT’S ENDING INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM?

Top notch CBC journalists—Trish Wood, Marianne Klowak, and Rodney Palmer—spill the beans. All three retired in disgust.

To understand what’s happened to journalism, we can point to the Trusted News Initiative (TNI), a global news brokerage claiming to combat misinformation and fake news. TNI was formed in 2019 because public trust in media was only 29%. A shotgun wedding transpired between all legacy media and all big tech, including Facebook and Google. The motive was information control. When COVID hit, the vaccine failed and public trust sank even lower. The TNI propaganda machine went into overdrive pushing “misinformation” paranoia. They needed people to stay obedient, fearful, and arguing among ourselves. Instead, many of us turned to researchers, ethical scientists, medical activists and citizen journalists who had the facts.

How TNI works: editors and reporters send news stories to TNI for approval before the information can be released. If TNI doesn’t approve, the story is red-penned and sent back. When they don’t like the expert a reporter is quoting, the reporter is told to use their in-house expert instead. Do you notice that TV news presenters all say the exact same message, same phrases, same sentences, all at the same time? That’s not “trustworthy”, it’s Orwell’s Ministry of Truth: you only know what we tell you.

We must ask, what will censorship accomplish? If they manage to end free speech, what then?  

TNI ended Marianne Klowak’s career. On the Trish Wood is Critical podcast (episode 159), Klowak said, “A number of stories that I put forward were blocked…it seemed to me as a journalist who’d been there 34 years, it’s like the rules had changed so quickly that it left me dizzy.” A scrupulous and trusted reporter, Klowak “had a show all put together about the vaccine injured, with interviewed experts who said the vaccine was a problem, and the CBC brass killed it. I took my concerns to the managing editor and senior executives but they didn’t care. Worse, CBC took the stance that anybody saying the vaccines were a problem was lying.” 

Before Trish Wood retired, she hosted The Fifth Estate and did award-winning investigative reporting for over 20 years. Talking with veteran reporter Rodney Palmer (episode 158), Wood said, “This generation of new journalists aren’t trained to think outside the box. It’s not in a real journalist’s DNA to promote anything as ‘safe and effective’. The media no longer report fairly on things that require debate.”

Palmer was less diplomatic: “I had to stop listening to the CBC. I got a sore throat from screaming at the radio while I was alone in my car, because I know things to be true and they were saying the opposite and it was bloody dangerous! What we’re hearing is propaganda and false messaging on behalf of the government.”

TNI is protecting globalist plans from exposure–with help from a stable of lazy, well-paid imbeciles who no longer care about honesty or integrity. Luckily, trusted citizen journalists have our backs. Get to know some of them in this article. And a few more under the Research Links page.



* What Would Ma Murray Think?

by B. H. Link (local professional writing under a pseudonym)

Some of us grew up in homes where grownups faithfully watched the evening news, read the daily city newspaper, and never thought to doubt how much was true. My dear mum spoke admiringly of “Peter” (Mansbridge, a former CBC news anchor) on a first-name basis; he was her trusted source for all things political. We later scoffed at those who would believe the ‘crazy talk’ on sources like U.S. Fox News. We felt informed about news events. Occasionally we’d come across people with ‘out there’ ideas, and an offhand dismissal seemed reasonable.

Little did we know.

Onward we venture into 2025 amid news from almost-endless sources worldwide. Strangely, free speech doesn’t feel very free anymore and we are too-often careful, even fearful, about voicing independent thoughts. Paradoxically it’s both easier and harder to find information AND to discern what appears to be true. With humility and courage we might question: What seems to be true? Who benefits from this message? Who funded this source? What kind of evidence is offered to support these ideas? Is it biased opinion, or an attempt to present more than one side for balance? What perspectives are being withheld, disparaged or dismissed, and why?

Media influence on our lives is HUGE; we can think we hold independent beliefs without realizing how some have been carefully fed to us over time. Simple slogans repeated strategically is a proven psychological manipulation technique. Accompanied by fear, even more powerful. Our attention is drawn to the ‘latest thing’; meanwhile far-reaching events occur behind the scenes and few notice.

The media was long considered an important check against those who might abuse power. Yet today reporters, announcers, editors and more from conventional media now cooperate with, and are generously funded by, governments and big corporations. Particularly Big Pharma. So a new term was coined: “censorship industrial complex”.

Rodney Palmer (now at Talk Nation Radio) is one of several whistleblowing journalists who testified at the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI). Referring to CBC misrepresentation of the Ottawa Freedom Convoy, he stated, “They took an exceptional moment to decide they would not be journalists, that instead they would be public health messengers … and the result is that Canada’s national broadcaster has morphed into a state broadcaster. And I worked in countries where there were state broadcasters – China, Syria, Malawi, North Korea – it’s promoting government policy without question, while censoring, belittling and shaming learned Canadians who dare to object and inform us of the truth. Bad journalism is incompetence but propaganda is a betrayal. And that’s what CBC has done, it betrayed us all.”   

Strong words. It’s worth questioning why we see no mention of the NCI on TV news, in the Sun or Province, or even in the BRLN. It was only an unprecedented citizen-funded, volunteer-organized inquiry with hundreds of witnesses exposing harmful and ongoing impacts of the Canadian Covid 19 response. Significant and relevant are understatements. And the MSM silence is deafening.

See for yourself: nationalcitizensinquiry.ca    

 (article courtesy of Connecting the Dots newsletter, January 2025)