* Reading Notes ~ Nest of Spies

Nest of Spies ~ the Startling Truth About Foreign Agents at Work Within Canada’s Borders

by Fabrice de Pierrebourg and Michel Juneau-Katsuya

The clever strategist is subtle, so much so that he is no longer visible. The clever strategist is discreet, so much so that he can not be heard. Thus he becomes the master of his enemy’s destiny. – Sun Tzu, The Art of War (c. 509 BCE) (1)

Espionage is a multi-faceted problem that challenges our society in many ways. The theft of Canadian cutting edge research in new products and technologies in only one of them, the visible tip of a vast, submerged and problematical iceberg. (2) Many of these issues are poorly understood by the general public. in some cases, information has been suppressed. A strange silence surrounds the subject in this country. (2) 

Consider this: there have been hundreds of prosecutions  of spies, including domestic traitors, in the United States, France, and Great Britain during the past fifteen years alone. But there has never been a prosecution for espionage in Canada. Not one. The widespread belief that espionage ended when the Cold War ended is unfortunately not true. The overall extent of espionage today is much greater than it was during the Cold War. Instead of two politically hostile blocs confronting each other [US and USSR], we now live in a global political and economic configuration where there is cloak-and-dagger warfare of all against all. (3) 

Canada’s oversized role in this drama is due to four factors.  First is our advanced technology (others want our know-how); second is the economy (they want our markets); third is political (they need to manipulate our national and international policies, making certain that citizens of foreign birth do not criticize their homelands). The final factor is military (they want our secrets, and those our allies share with us). (3-4)

And then we must consider one of the dubious consequences of multiculturalism, that wonderful human mosaic, which we rightly celebrate, but which also readily conceals the newly arrived spy. It offers him or her a useful reservoir of potential sources for the homeland, as well as informers anxious to denounce malcontents. And finally, there is the open-hearted character of Canadians, who welcome foreigners without asking a lot of questions. This propensity arises from our liberal and inclusive culture, and we are proud of it, but it is readily abused by curious visitors: particularly those who intend to leave with intellectual property in their pockets. (4) 

Where espionage is concerned, the change is two-fold. The first is that military espionage has indeed declined. [Really? Somehow I highly doubt that] The other part, the important part, is that its resources were redeployed to the small but expanding speciality of economic espionage. What began as small and intermittent theft of industrial research has now grown into a vast and destabilizing form of economic warfare. (16) 

The mafiosi and the oligarchs grew fat during the chaotic years of the USSR’s collapse. [Whitney Webb documents this, too, in her incredible tome, One Nation Under Blackmail, in which she documents the prominent Americans who also grew fat from the USSR’s collapse.] Today they are held in contempt by average Russians, but that is only because they successfully seized a good part of the country riches through the purchase of state companies at derisory prices. At the same time, the security services ransacked the treasury of the Soviet Communist Party and used the booty to set up more than 600 overseas corporations. This new structure was essentially in place by 1993. Since then there has been a golden age of collusion among organized crime, legitimate business, bankers, and corrupt politicians. In a 1994 report, CSIS alluded to the disappearance of billions of dollars in value from the Russian economy in what it called a “criminal revolution”. With the aid of Vladimir Putin, scores of agents from the old KGB infiltrated the worlds of politics and business. A Russian sociologist reported in 2005 that around 80 percent of key positions in the corporate and government hierarchy were occupied by siloviki, a sinister term referring to senior police and military officers now tricked out with bespoke suits and attaché cases.  (21-22)

After the events of September 11, 2001, however, the other countries of the western alliance also turned their backs on the old Cold War template. Overnight most investigative resources were shifted to Osama bin Laden, to the great satisfaction of the growing army of Russian and Chinese undercover agents. (29) 

This leads us back to Biopreparat, a biological weapons program started in 1973. Since the USSR had signed a treaty to ban biological weapons less than a year before, it was always publicly described as a routine pharmaceutical research project. It remained one of the best kept secrets of the Cold War. Difficult to track because it was decentralized in a string of laboratories scattered across remote regions of the USSR, Biopreparat was scaled to produce an armoury of fully usable weapons derived from toxins, deadly viruses, and bacteria. (64) 

For all the resources devoted to it, this dark program depended on infusions of information form the advanced laboratories of the West. According to Alibekov, the second-in-command at Biopreparat who had defected to the US, it was the job of the KGB to steal these toxins and viruses and send the samples back to Biopreparat. Alibekov revealed how agents from the highly secretive Department 12 of Directory S were posted around the planet in order to expedite the business. They used the diplomatic bag from various Soviet embassies and consulates to transport laboratory phials filled with dehydrated germ cells, cultures, and assorted deadly substances that they had acquired from their collaborators. These plague bags travelled in the pilot’s cabin of Aeroflot jetliners. (64) 

Agents linked to Biopreparat targeted in particular the Defense and Development agency at the Canadian Air Force base in Suffield, Alberta. The mandate of this highly classified operation is to create medical treatments and systems of defence against both chemical and biological attack. It was a place entirely fascinating to Soviet authorities, and only a simpleton would imagine that they are any less interested today. (65) Their final destination was either Suffield, Alberta, or the military research centre at Fort Detrick, Maryland—two biological laboratories working in close concert. [65)  

Not too long ago, should anybody think the Biopreparat story a relic of another era, the British security agency MI-6 caught Russian spies lurking near a biological research center. Their objective was to steal ampoules containing anthrax and Ebola virus. That was in 2007. (66) 

With the dramatic dissolution of the Soviet bloc after 1989, Canadian politicians competed with each other to cut back on the amount of money spent on national security. Some leaders babbled about “peace dividends” and seriously contemplated abolishing counter-espionage altogether. CSIS’s budgets and staff were reduced by nearly half, at a time when hostile governments were already rebuilding their espionage networks. This raises questions about the Canadian political system. Why do we produce so few leaders capable of dealing seriously with these issues? There is in this country a persistent belief that espionage is somebody else’s problem. Do we really believe that Ronald Reagan’s “evil empire” has simply faded away? If so, who is sending all these freshly minted and highly motivated spies to Canada? Do we have something they want? Why do China, Israel, France, Pakistan, and many other countries also do us the honour of sending legions of spies to take up a Canadian address? (122)

These are the principal areas of [espionage] activity: economic and industrial; surveillance and suppression of dissidents; manipulation of foreign political systems; military espionage; research into the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. (122-3)

To put it simply, spies operate outside of all legal frameworks. The local loyalties that most of us feel have no importance on this chessboard, where all moves are strategic and the players treat people and places as mere pawns, to be played according to the needs of the game. This is the dynamic that determines Canada’s role in the great scheme of things. It is not, perhaps, an inspiring one. At worst, chance has dealt us the role of victim; at best, we are a  happenstance pawn in a deadly game much bigger than ourselves.  (123) 

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, leaders of the G8 countries committed themselves to economic espionage. They made no secret of it. The stakes had changed, and it was time to become proactive. Canada, however, did not make this commitment. Our governments were aware of economic espionage, of course, but never did more than timidly advise the intelligence services to keep a watching brief on the matter. This was hardly the same thing as adopting the decisive and ruthless policies that our supposed allies were already employing. (124)

Canadians would be shocked if they understood the climate of fear in which many of their fellow citizens must live, for no reason other than the happenstance that they were born abroad and chose to come to Canada. Many immigrant communities are, in effect, taken hostage by agents of their homeland government. These governments have few or no democratic scruples. When the victims approach Canadian authorities for help they are met with avoidance and moral equivocation. After being repeatedly rebuffed, they lose hope. After all, the Canadian government is now the only government they have. If it chooses to ignore them, there is nowhere else to go. (135)

Weapons of mass destruction (WMD) research, from nuclear to chemical to bacteriological, is carried out in our universities. That’s why our weaponry and operational plans are of great interest to foreign powers. They are also aware that our allies share desirable information with us, and that hundreds of foreign military officers are posted to our army, navy and air force bases. International trafficking in Canadian-made weaponry is another poorly understood subject. We are an unusually open society and, for the time being at least, we enjoy a reputation for integrity. International arms traffickers take advantage of the situation. They steal weapon prototypes or use Canada as a convenient transit route for international arms shipments. (139)

“Dual purpose” technologies are those originally developed for civilian products but which can also be used to improve weapons; sometimes they appear on the frontier between bio-weapon research and legitimate medical research. They are subject to high security, but foreign agents exploit the lapses that occur in transferring them between private sector and military use. (139)

Most spies in Canada are working under protection of diplomatic immunity. It’s the best possible cover because it allows the “diplomat” to socialize with Canadians from all levels of society. If this “diplomat” commits a crime, whether espionage-related or a regular Criminal Code offence, he or she cannot be tried before a Canadian judge, only sent home as a persona non grata. (140) 

HUMINT is Human Intelligence, meaning information gathered from informants. SIGINT is Signals Intelligence, gathered by intercepting all forms of electronic communication. OSINT is Open Source Intelligence, or information that might be published in newspapers or broadcast publicly. ( 141)  

Of all the countries that happily dance across the Canadian border to shoplift out technology, China is far and away the busiest and the most aggressive. Chinese agents exploit a certain liberal Canadian sympathy toward their country that dates back to the 1960s. they don’t even much bother to disguise what they’re doing as they operate out of their Ottawa embassy and their three consulates in Vancouver, Calgary and Toronto. Meanwhile, the Canadian government—including, unfortunately, CSIS itself—is so befuddled that it hasn’t begun to understand how serious the problem is. (147) 

In the US, UK, and Australia there is an average of one trial per month of Chinese agents charged with economic or industrial espionage. One per month. In Canada, Chinese spies have never been brought to court, even though Canada is at least as rich a target as those other countries. (147) 

Although China is capable of innovation, the underpinnings of its culture and society are heavily connected to tradition. There are two particularly useful tools for understanding what kind of tradition this is: Sun Tzu’s book The Art of War and the ancient board game called Go. The game of Go, with its underpinnings of philosophy and strategic thought, has been learned and played as a discipline by China’s emperors, ministers of state, warlords, and imperial officers since the fourth century BCE. Used for centuries as a way for the Chinese to shape strategy, the game is based on an initial division of power between the realm of outright control and the realm of influence. The player seeks to move his pieces on the board in such a way as, first, to encircle and conquer territory outright, and second, to encircle and thereby influence whatever can’t be conquered. Whoever possesses the most territory at the end wins. (150) 

Sun Tzu’s life predates even the popularity of Go. He was a general in the sixth century BCE. His small book, which has thirteen chapters, covers military strategy generally but concentrates on the mechanics of leading successful campaigns and of carrying on clandestine operations within enemy territory. It is part of today’s compulsory curriculum for the Chinese officer corps and, of course, aspiring SIS agents. (150)

Chinese strategists have long understood that influence is more important than control. This is because influence, wisely deployed, will ultimately lead to control. That’s why the Go player will rarely launch a frontal assault. Almost always he begins by moving his players to locations where the enemy finds them to be unthreatening and even useful. (151) 

When a nation sets out to make friends, the first “soldiers” into the battle are honey-tongued emissaries who really do hope for good relations with your country. If you’ll be our special friend, they say, we’ll buy what we need from you alone. And when we sell, well, talk about getting it wholesale! You won’t believe the deals! (151) 

The Security and Intelligence Service (SIS) of China plans its operations in generational rather than calendar-year intervals. This kind of long-term planning, all by itself and without further cleverness, is enough to baffle the fast-food mentality of western intelligence agencies. These take as their mantra the dubious slogan “Time is money.” Meanwhile, their Chinese counterparts sit back and relax. Given the time-obsession of the enemy, it’s only a question of waiting for him to grow tired and inattentive. When the other side drops his guard, that’s the moment to activate one’s resources. Also, if you flood the enemy with an overwhelming number of agents, some might be caught but several will succeed. (152-3) 

What was going on during all those years the agents were out of contact with the homeland? They were steadily climbing the career ladder of their chosen Canadian company or their government ministry. In either case, they’re now at the executive level and they have received security clearance. To the employer they are long-term, very loyal employees, and giving then a high-level clearance was the easy and obvious thing to do. (153) 

And now, by way of recalling that it is useful to be curious the workings of Chinese culture, remember that in China there are countless thousands of young people who aspire to become exactly such sleeper agents for their homeland. (153)   

As a totalitarian country, China has the additional advantage of knowing that its citizens will do exactly what they’re told. To refuse is unthinkable. If you hesitate, your family will be told that you are a “traitor” to the nation. The punishment for your ambivalence will be meted out to those you hold nearest and dearest. (155) 

The elaborate Hollywood-type masquerade that lets a foreign agent “infiltrate” a foreign government or corporation is not much used in the real world. The perpetrator is far likelier to be an exceedingly naive Canadian who is anxious to please a new Chinese “friend”. The friend in question is often a diplomat who is grateful for any information that might help him to “do his job or come to a better understanding of Canada.” From our perspective, the most amazing thing is the puppy-dog-like wagging of Canadian tails as we endeavor to be of service to our exotic new friends. (157) 

To expand and anchor its influence, China has developed a strategy similar to that of the Trojan horse. Confucius, the celebrated moral and political philosopher of ancient China, was far ahead of his time in understanding that peace and justice can thrive only where rulers are professional and scrupulously honest. Today Confucius whose writings were once banned by Mao Zedong because they emphasize respect for a hierarchy. This was thought to be “reactionary” and not compatible with Communist principles. But history has its own sense of irony, and today the honest humanist described by Confucius is seen as the saviour of the system, the good federalist who will ride to the rescue and revive China’s pride and nationalism. (158) 

Confucius Institutes have since multiplied with astonishing speed and can now be found in more than eighty countries. They are ubiquitous in Africa, where China is working to establish a dominant presence. After only five years, there are 314 in operation in 81 countries, and the program is just getting underway. China expects to be operating a thousand of them by the year 2020. [where are they at now?] (159) 

The big issue is this: are the partnership agreements that these Institutes habitually sign with both a Chinese and (in this case) Canadian university—and in many cases with Chinese high-tech enterprises—not in fact a cover-up for a gigantic system of siphoning and draining away of other people’s scientific research? In other words, are the Confucius Institutes a case of “soft power” in the service of “soft spying”? (160) 

The Israeli security agency Mossad sold the software product called Promis to a number of police forces and security agencies around the world—including Canada—in the 1990s. The programming turned out to include a “trap” or “back door.” It was a dirty trick that allowed Mossad to follow the movements of Palestinians in Canada when they were under surveillance by our police. The information was used in Israel’s bloody struggle with Yasser Arafat and the PLO. (168-9) 

Chinese Han immigrants to Tibet now outnumber the native population by more than 2 million, and newcomers continue to throng toward Tibet’s capital city, Lhasa, with the kind of energy that Canadians can muster only when there’s a round of job offerings in the Alberta tar sands. Further masses of Han colonists will arrive on the recently completed “railway to the roof of the world” (sometimes described as the “railway of colonization”), which was built with the help of Bombardier, Nortel, and General Electric. Beijing spent $4.2 billion on the project. (184)

Jiang Chengzong would like Canadians to believe that the building of the railway proceeded from affection for the people of Tibet, rather than its strategic proximity to India, not to mention the mineral wealth of the sprawling Himalayan country. This is a remarkable assertion of selflessness in light of reports that Tibet contains the world’s largest reserves of chrome and aluminum, together with not insignificant quantities of uranium and electric-car-powering lithium. (185)

Today, former Ambassador Mei sets aside diplomacy in favour of a straightforward plea for China. The propaganda is adroitly blended with economic blackmail. China, he says, is patiently waiting for Canada to come to its senses. How much longer can China maintain the current level of trade and commercial exchange if Canada keeps being so confrontational? The audience gets the subtext. They are people of influence, and China requires them to use their influence to change Canada’s foreign policy. Otherwise they will most certainly miss the diplomatic gravy train. 

“Foreign interference” is a polite diplomatic term that masks a little-known aspect of international espionage. Setting aside for a moment the everyday theft of commercial and technological information, let’s take a look at the extensive machinery that undermines Canadian government policy-making. It aims to intimidate the host government and suborn public and private organizations that can advance the foreign regime’s interests. At least 20 foreign countries have agents in Canada…Obviously this is unacceptable to a democracy. But they won’t be discouraged. Nor will they stop shadowing, subverting, harassing, intimidating, and coercing their diaspora communities here, especially the many political movements in exile. Foreign interference now appears to be the most serious threat to Canada, at least so far as the scale of the operations is concerned. More than 6 million Canadians, about one-fifth of the population, were born elsewhere. Multiculturalism has given birth to multi-espionage and multi-intimidation.  (187) 

The Falun Gong (also called Falun Dafa) was founded—or perhaps “invented” is a better word—by Li Hongzhi in 1992. Its adepts practise a highly original mixture of non-violent Buddhist philosophy and Taoist gymnastics. At the beginning the movement was legal. But Falun Gong suffered a sudden reversal of fortune one night in April 1999. Thousands of its devotees from all corners of China converged without warning in Beijing. There they surrounded the headquarters of the government and the Communist Party, where they stood in utter silence for several hours. Then they left the area in an orderly fashion, without making a sound. (201-2)

The event was pacifist and brief, although certainly eccentric and unsettling. And all might have been well, except that the rally had fallen ten years after the infamous massacre of students in nearby Tiananmen Square. The authorities realized the connection, as they were meant to. But then they panicked…it was humiliating to the apparatchiks that such a well-organized event had occurred without their spies hearing of it first. Lashing out reflexively, they banned Falun Gong and denounced it as a “heretic organization”. Its followers were attacked and beaten wherever they were found. This quasi-hysterical frenzy has now passed beyond China’s borders. (202)

When asked about the nature of Falun Gong, the group’s Canadian spokesperson, Lucy Zhou, wants one thing understood: “We are ordinary people. Falun Gong is not a sect. Nobody is a ‘member’ of it. It’s simply a way of life…that is beneficial for a person’s health. (203-4)

Mehmet Tohti, a 35-year-old official of the Uyghur Canadian Association is frightened. “Since September 11, 2001, we’ve been the Chechens of China.” He beings by describing the Uyghers and their situation in a remote corner of China’s far west. They speak a Turkic language that has no connection at all with Chinese languages. Until 1949 they had no connection with China. But that year the Communist forces, which had just seized power, pushed into the far west and seized control of eastern Turkistan as well. It was given a new name—the Autonomous Region of Xinjiang—and it was soon colonized. It is a vast area of 2 million square kilometers, and today there are approximately as many Han Chinese living there as indigenous Uyghurs: each group makes up about 40% of the population. 

Where terrorism is concerned, Canadians at best display the wide-eyed detachment of those who find a subject interesting but in no way connected to themselves. Concerning Air India Flight 182, however, we manage something more than detachment: it’s been stricken from memory as if it never existed. (235)

Irangate was a truly scandalous business. It gave birth to the “October Surprise” theory, which held that Ronald Reagan’s Republicans plotted with the ayatollahs in order to bring about the defeat of Jimmy Carter in the 1980 presidential election. Ben-Menashe believes the plot was nicely tied up and packaged in October, a month before the election, in a salon of the ultra-chic Ritz Hotel in Paris. This was the deal: the United States and Israel supplied weapons to Iran’s religious leaders to help them in their war with Iraq, while unfreezing their financial assets, which had been blocked in American banks. The quid pro quo was that Teheran would keep the fifty-four hostages from the American embassy under lock and key until after the U.S. elections were over. (274-5)

“The weapons came from the United States….Pierre Trudeau agreed to it after an informal meeting with Israel.” Twice during 2005, a Canadian airport was used to ship weapons and explosives from the US to a country on the Indian Subcontinent that was threatened by a Marxist uprising. So the Eitan/Ben-Menashe operation would hardly the first time Canada served as a convenient doormat to erase the muddy footprints of arms traffickers. (275) 

When a Canadian corporation was asked by the Chinese for an “official visit” it was a technique of Chinese espionage.  “The board members started babbling excitedly about the size of the Chinese market. They were like teenage boys asking the homecoming queen for a date.” (283) The corp took all kinds of measures to protect their assets. “But the security boss was still anxious He’d made time to join the Chinese visitors personally for their tours of the plant. He’d kept his eyes open as well, and he’d noticed something odd. It was the shoes. Nobody’s shoes stay completely clean walking around a factory, of course. But the Chinese engineers’ shoes were remarkably dirty. Stuff from the floor seemed almost to jump onto them. And one guy appeared to have breadcrumbs that clung improbably to his rather long tie. The security man was a quick thinker, and he made up a rule on the spot that required visitors to remove their shoes before moving on to the next department. The shoes were rushed to the lab, where he was amazed to learn that one of them contained a magnet that grabbed scraps of metal from the factory floor. As for the visitor who had the annoying habit of leaning into garbage pails filled with scrap metal, they’d had to confront hi. Damned if he didn’t turn out to have a magnet in his tie as well. This was the strangest example of reverse engineering he’d ever seen. The plan was clearly to take the precious scraps back to China and find out what chemical elements in what proportions had gone into fabricating them. These visitors meant to rob his company blind. (284) 

There’s a difference between “information” and “intelligence”. Information is what you collect during your research. Intelligence is the outcome of a process. This is the formula we use to describe how intelligence is produced: Information + Analysis = Intelligence. (287)

Steaming an envelope is neither as old-fashioned nor as uncommon as one might think. In Canada it is sometimes risked by private detectives, but not often, because it’s a criminal act with heavy consequences. It’s also easy to get caught doing it. But none of this applies once you leave Canada. Certain national security services simply open all the mail that comes from foreign countries, plucking confidential corporate information and occasionally uncovering a juicy traitor or two. (298) 

Garbage picking. What a glamourous business we have here! From dumpster-diving to the delicate sifting of monsieur’s kitchen scraps, the trained agents of a nation’s lofty secret service organizations rub elbows with gumshoes and peepers from back-alley agencies. (299)

Exchanging engineers and technicians is a reliable and popular method of slipping one’s agents into a targeted competitor’s operation. When a delegation arrives at your front door, it will contain a number of spies with a tightly designed plan for stealing information. Sometimes these delegations are made up entirely of spies. This is the moral of an unfortunate tale told by a well-known Canadian corporation, dominant in its market, that accepted an offer to build a partnership with a Chinese company. As a condition of the arrangement, the Chinese bosses insisted on sending a team of twenty-five engineers and technicians for a lengthy working visit to their Canadian “partner”. Considering the stakes, the CEO of the Canadian enterprise disregarded his security director’s warnings and pleas. …[despite all measures to protect their intellectual property] after 72 hours the Chinese engineers had broken into every forbidden database. (300-1)

What really went beyond all limits in this episode was the reaction of the company’s CEO when the “visitors” were unmasked. This occurred at a board meeting where the CEO was present. When the security director had finished exhibiting the evidence and drawing his conclusions, the CEO asked to speak. He curtly informed the security director that his comments were “immoderate” and that the presentation was “not exactly what we were looking for”. In effect, the company did not want to know what was going on. The security director was later warned that “fear mongering” was bad for his career. (301-2) 

Then there is the tactic of eliminating the researchers. We wish this were a tongue-in-cheek way of suggesting they be bribed, but we are in fact talking about murdering them. The pharmaceutical research industry has a remarkable reputation for brutality. The development and marketing of a single new medication costs on average $800 million, which means that a professional killer’s $50-60K tab is just so much small change… (306) 

-30-

* Reading Notes: Spycraft & Intelligence

~ research notes from non-fiction books I’ve recently read ~ for the benefit of all researchers and dedicated, informed citizens 

Book and Dagger ~ How Scholars and Librarians Became the Unlikely Spies of WW2 by Elyse Graham 

Definition of Intelligence: “The world’s least glamourous people for the world’s most glamourous profession.” 

1941. After Pearl Harbour, the U.S. radically changed its foreign policy of avoiding scuffles perceived as being relevant to Europe and other places beyond America. 

They [scholars and librarians] went to training camps and “covered every aspect of spy craft: how to withstand interrogation; how to memorize someone’s appearance without resorting to useless descriptions like ‘normal height’ or ‘average face’; how to write in code; how to steal and alter identity documents; how to fight; how to kill quietly.”

President Truman created the OSS (Office of Strategic Services, nicknamed Oh So Social for all the drunken parties they had) on America’s entry into the war in 1942. After the war ended the OSS was briefly dissolved —for fear of how it could harm America from within. Shortly thereafter the CIA was formed. 

CIA: Unelected, centralized government-funded and approved agency of intelligence. It gave a place for a segment of the human population to think in spy, to live spy, long term. It’s how their brains are wired. The combined efforts spawned a vast array of sneaky, lying tactics, actors in a long play, a blooming of black roses, let’s say. They had a big library of secrets and dirt. 

Parties in Georgetown, WA, galore. Dissolved in 1945. “We don’t want to risk having an American gestapo.” This was just as Operation Paperclip was developing. The era of secrets—top secrets—began a long time ago. 

Previous incarnation of OSS was the Office of the Coordinator of Information. 

1942. The frontline became libraries and librarians recall “coming to work and finding that the map library had suddenly become top security area protected by 24-hour armed guards”. America’s supply of global maps was woefully small back then. 

What made a great spy wasn’t gadgets; what made a great saboteur wasn’t bombs. It was cleverness, cunning, an ability to believe in the power of small acts of rebellion.” (p199)

For decades, college students followed tunnels that led straight from the seminar room to the CIA. Among intelligence agencies like the CIA the phrase “P sources” – short for professor source – used to be code for the professors and university administrators who recruited on their behalf. For a time, Ivy league schools supplied a disproportionate amount of new employees of the CIA, according to the CIA’s in-house journal Studies in Intelligence (p292) 

For much of the second half of the 20th century, intelligence agencies recruited in large numbers from departments of English, History and the social sciences—and they still relied on professors in those departments to help turn data into usable intelligence. Humanities scholars moved in the hidden world of spies, and spies, in turn, shaped major institutions in the humanities. (p292) 

The world was incredibly fortunate (lol) that the United States was able to turn its greatest advantage at the start of WW2, its lack of a standing intelligence service, into its greatest advantage. That advantage came from innovation: because they weren’t tied down by established ways of doing things, the professors and librarians of OSS, and the refugees who joined them, were able to create something new. They became the scholars who invented modern spy craft. (297)

Jonathon Swift: “Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect.”

Washington Post Feb. 99 “When Seeing and Hearing isn’t Believing”: “Digital morphing—voice, video and photo—has come of age, available for use in psychological operations. PSYOPS, as the military calls it, seek to exploit human vulnerabilities in enemy governments, militaries and populations to pursue national battlefield objectives…” [Note: Whitney Webb’s observation that Americans have not cottoned on to the fact that they themselves are also considered “enemies” and are also being subjected to the same dirty warfaring techniques the American military has used on people overseas.)

The Yale library–and a young English professor–would serve as a cover for a secret agent who would “go abroad ostensibly to acquire books for the library, but actually to gather intelligence”. (intro xii)

OSS recruited 100s of “mild mannered professors and oddball archivists and restless librarians”. 

Europeans had been developing spy craft for centuries so the Americans, knowing they could not beat them at their game, found an intelligence resource that other countries in the war were underestimating. (intro xiv)

The 900 secret agents in the Research and Analysis (R&A) were called the “Chairborne Division”. The war may have been fought on battlefields but it was won in libraries. (intro xv)

The power of power from down below. 

The library rats of the OSS approached problems differently than their enemy counterparts, the Nazis. They saw  military intel in newspaper society columns, maps to unfamiliar cities in phone books, trash, enemy newspapers, railway rate schedules, vacation photographs of buildings the OSS wanted to burgle or demolish, and many more. 

Pearl Harbour attack on Dec. 7/41 showed Americans they had no intelligence infrastructure. Recruits had no idea how to “spy” and, like their instructors, probably gleaned what they could from spy novels and radio programs, and movies. Later on from TV. 

Just how do you teach women and men who held ordinary jobs—teacher, professor, librarian, secretary, hospital technician—to suddenly become saboteurs, prison interrogators, undercover agents, resistance cell liaisons, etc?

Spy school courses fell into 5 categories: cryptology, criminal skills like burglary, sabotage, how to kill, psychological warfare, recognizing enemy police officers and intelligence agents, and secrecy. (p39)

OSS operatives whom the Gestapo captured had to be able to hold out under interrogations for 48 hours, not because there was any chance of rescue but so their underground allies had the time they needed to safely relocate. 

In England in the 1940s, England assigned an upper class mystery writer and screenwriter to the position of interviewer of potential female secret agents. 

Students became couriers, saboteurs, recruiters, propagandists, whisperers seeding conflict. 

A Woman of No Importance — the Untold Story of the American Spy Who Helped Win World War II by Sonia Purnell

Back in 1953, “morale generally at the CIA was low, with one in five officers leaving in 1953 alone. Many believed their bosses did not know what they were doing and wasted a “shocking amount of money” on failed missions overseas, which were falsely claimed as successes. (sound familiar?) To the outside world the CIA represented the highest form of public service and an omnipotent muscular force intent on subverting and sabotaging Communism. But insiders claimed that “incompetent people were given great power and capable recruits were stacked like cordwood in the corridors”. (p300)

Operation Paperclip, “the code name for the wholesale recruitment of former senior Nazis on the grounds that however barbaric their conduct in the war they also ranked as the ultimate anti-Soviets. The U.S. Army’s intelligence operation had taken on the Butcher of Lyon himself, Klaus Barbie. Men who had been responsible for the torture and deaths of so many […] were now being spirited away from their war crimes tribunals to safety” by the U.S and were paid handsomely by the American government. (p301) 

-30-

* Winnipeg Lab Breached by Chinese Scientists

This article was written by the brilliant forensic investigator, Andy Lee, who is on the X platform. This greatly complicates what we’ve been told about COVID, bringing into clear focus the complex web of deceit that surrounded the public messaging about the so-called vaccine. And it implicates Canada in a startling and disturbing way.

Chrétien Family Linked to Chinese Scientist Involved In Winnipeg Laboratory Breach

~ Michel Chrétien, the brother of former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, carried out research studies on deadly viruses with a Chinese-Canadian scientist removed by the RCMP.

By Andy Lee 

She was a brilliant scientist, credited as one of the researchers who helped cure Ebola. Then came the news of her sudden removal, followed by reports of virus shipments to China. No one knows where she is now, but we do know where she has been. One thing is for certain – the story of Dr. Xiangguo Qiu is a mysterious one.

The problems appeared to start in 2019.

It was that summer the news broke that Dr. Xiangguo Qiu, along with her husband Keding Cheng and a number of unidentified Chinese students, had been escorted out of the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg, Canada by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). The sudden removal of Qiu on July 5, a prominent virologist who was at one time the head of the Vaccine Development and Antiviral Therapies department in the Special Pathogen Program of the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), sent shockwaves through the international community. The NML, a biosafety level-4 laboratory (BSL-4), is Canada’s only laboratory equipped to contain and deal with the world’s most deadly pathogens. One of only about 50 worldwide, it is operated by the Government of Canada through PHAC. The removal of Qiu and her colleagues was described as a “policy breach,” and assurances were given to the public that there was no safety risk. Those assurances however felt meek, particularly after Covid-19 hit in December of 2019. Qiu’s work, though centred mostly around the Ebola virus, also crossed into coronavirus research. Her husband had published research on Covid-19’s predecessor which hit Canada in 2003: Severe Acute Respiratory Virus (SARS). It had further been discovered in August of 2019 that Qiu had been collaborating with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the BSL-4 lab theorized to have been the source of a lab leak resulting in the Covid-19 pandemic. Much speculation followed. Charges were never laid in the matter however, and after having her security clearance revoked and being placed on administrative leave for almost two years, she was finally officially fired in January 2021.

The reasoning behind her firing remains murky. Access to information requests obtained by CBC showed that she had been shipping live viruses, including Ebola and Henipah, to Beijing, in March of 2019, preceding her removal from NML. Any shipments would have required the approval of PHAC however, who insisted that all relevant protocols were followed. It was never confirmed if the shipment was a part of the RCMP investigation.

While we may never know the exact reason why Qiu was escorted out that day – theories ranged from espionage concerns, to intellectual property infringement, to technical policy missteps – we do know one thing now. She united with Michel Chrétien, the brother of former Prime Minister of Jean Chrétien, to expand their joint research interests. And that research was later used in work done on novel Covid-19 therapies by Michel Chrétien in further collaboration with China down the road.

Qiu’s breakthrough came in 2013. After years of experimental research with monoclonal antibodies, a combination of three which she dubbed “ZMab” showed immense promise in protecting against oft-lethal Ebola infections. Her research paper on the subject stated “We previously demonstrated that the administration of ZMAb within 24 hours after exposure [to Ebola virus] completely protected all treated NHPs (non-human primates)” – an incredible claim against a pathogen with a mortality rate approaching ninety per cent. That Chrétien would want to work with her is hardly surprising. Her study was nothing short of a miracle.

The title of the paper detailing their joint research efforts is “Dr. Chrétien’s Love Affair With China,” and it is fascinating.

Chrétien, a researcher at the Clinical Research Institute of Montreal (IRCM), made headlines in early 2020 after it was postulated whether there may be a “made-in-Canada” solution to the coronavirus outbreak. Michel’s prior work using quercetin – a popular supplement – drew broad attention, particularly from China. His former studies had involved studying quercetin’s effectiveness in treating Ebola, which were done in conjunction with NML during the 2014 Ebola outbreak. What was not known at the time is that Qiu – the virologist later removed by the RCMP – was the scientist at NML running the experiments for him. The article details how Chrétien contacted Qiu in 2014 to run tests for him using quercetin on Ebola at the NML. After finding success in those trials, they later conducted similar investigations on Zika virus, claiming that the results were “beyond their expectations.”

There were beliefs that quercetin may also work on Covid-19, and the clinical trials commenced in China before Covid-19 was even declared a pandemic. Chrétien, an accomplished scientist who has won many awards in his field, had studied at Berkeley, and trained with Dr. Choh Hao Li. He maintained high-level connections to Chinese researchers afterward, having been granted an honorary professorship at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences in the 1980s. He is also credited for bringing Chinese students to the IRCM to train at the prestigious institution. He later used those connections to contact researchers in Wuhan in February of 2020, asking if he could help by sending samples for clinical trials to test quercetin’s efficacy in treating Covid-19. A million dollars was donated by the Lazaridis Family Foundation to commence the study in February 2020. The WHO declared Covid-19 a global pandemic shortly after, on March 11, 2020.

The study was quietly scrapped and cancelled in late 2020, citing a lack of clinical subjects to test the remedy on. The claim was that the virus had been “quickly brought under control,” in China, rendering the study irrelevant as “the number of patients needed to set up clinical trials was no longer available there [in China].” Of course, today, after witnessing years of brutal-but-futile lockdowns in China put into place in a misguided government effort to mitigate the spread of the virus, we know that wasn’t true at all.

We will never know definitively what transpired at the Winnipeg NML. The Liberal government has made sure of that, taking the extraordinary step to kill any investigation by suing the House Speaker to block the release of records regarding the firing of Qiu and her husband.”It appears that what you might well call Chinese agents infiltrated one of the highest prized national security elements when it comes to biosecurity and biodefence,” said Christian Leuprecht, a security expert and professor at the Royal Military College.

We know that Qiu, originally from and trained in China, sent live viral samples to Beijing, and that she was a key asset in building relationships with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Her trips to China were well-known and documented, and hardly clandestine in nature. She took five trips to the Wuhan Institute of Virology through 2017-2018 alone, following its approval as a BSL-4 facility in 2017. PHAC and the Government of Canada were certainly aware of her activities and were encouraging not just her, but others to forge closer ties to Chinese researchers. Was she releasing information to scientists working for the Chinese government during those trips? Almost certainly. They were research partners. Was she doing it without the full knowledge and grace of PHAC, and running afoul of protocols or treading into espionage territory? Difficult to say. Only she, and maybe a handful of others, know.

One thing that we can say for certain is that her investigations in her field were invaluable, likely changing millions of lives, and that it appears that the groundwork she helped to lay not just in Ebola, but in quercetin research, conjointly with Michel Chrétien, had immeasurable potential that was unfortunately never realized. We will never get answers on why his study in China, later confirmed to show promise in treating Covid-19, was cancelled, just as we will never be told why CanSino abandoned early trials on vaccine research with Canadian scientists.

The other lesson to be learned is that we have to be more cautious with how we approach research and development projects with the Chinese government. Stricter protocols and guidelines are necessary to define intellectual property boundaries. Qiu’s name appeared on numerous research papers done in conjunction with the Academy of Military Science in China, as well as on several patents submitted to the China National Intellectual Property Administration. Is this where the trouble started? Projects and partnerships need to be carefully monitored by PHAC going forward to defend national security interests, and even while PHAC was acutely aware of Qiu’s work with with Chinese researchers, she still somehow ended up barred from one of our top laboratory facilities. Did she get caught up in an intellectual property battle by transferring research to the Chinese government? And Chrétien’s cancelled quercetin trials – which barely even made the news – should certainly serve as an advisory notice for Canadian workers who carry out research with China, only to have those projects inexplicably shelved for dubious reasons.

As for the the sad story of Qiu, an incredible Chinese-Canadian virologist who helped to cure Ebola, it appears that the answers to those questions will remain tightly locked in the vault of Covid-era secrets, along with many others. It should be the strongest precautionary tale to Canada of them all however; whatever else she may have been, she was a genius in her field, and it is hard to argue that what happened to her should be described as anything other than a tragic loss for all. 

https://sleepingwithgiants.substack.com/p/chretien-family-linked-to-chinese